On 12/8/19 8:17 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> 
> That's not our mangling, it's your client's.  Ours would look like
> this:
> 
>     "Allan Hansen (han...@rc.org) via list" <r...@mail.rc.org>


Actually, that's still not quite correct. Ours looks like

"xxx via list" <r...@mail.rc.org>

where xxx is
if original From contains a display name then that display name
else if original From is a member and the member has a real name then
that real name
else the From email address.

I.e., it could be

"Allan Hansen via list" <r...@mail.rc.org>

or

"han...@rc.org via list" <r...@mail.rc.org>

but wouldn't be

"Allan Hansen (han...@rc.org) via list" <r...@mail.rc.org>

I suspect this latter is due to what Allan alluded to when he said "I
did the code change for the mangling long ago ...".

-- 
Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to