On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 14:51 -0500, Bill Cole wrote: > On 27 Feb 2020, at 14:24, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote: > > > Personally, I'd like to see the GNU Mailman project have a formal > > Mailman 2.3 release that supports Python3, I feel that there would be > > a > > lot of support for that. > > I'm sure there would be widespread applause and congratulations if such > a thing were actually released. That sort of "support" is unhelpful > towards actually making such a release. > > The needed support is the actual skilled effort of writing the required > Python3 code. I don't have the time to hunt down the specific > statements, but I have vague recollections that both Barry and Mark have > said repeatedly that doing so would be substantially more effort than > they are willing to put into anything built on the MM2 architecture.
Interestingly enough, here's a roadmap on exactly how to do it: :) https://engineering.linkedin.com/blog/2020/how-we-retired-python-2-and-improved-developer-happiness -Jim P. ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
