On 10/17/22 23:41, Yuki Nie wrote:
Hi Mark,
As far as I checked, The Reply-To address is indeed modertated.
However, is it necessary to add the addr to 'accept_these_nonmembers'?
That won't work. If the post is determined to be from a member because
of Reply-To:, that member's moderation applies. *_these_nonmembers only
applies to posts that are not from a member.
I found some dicsussion here. It seems relpy-to addr has no relation
with 'accept_these_nonmembers'.
Correct.
If yes, would you like to provide more details to explain why we need to
add the 'reply-to' address?
The addresses that are checked for list membership are by default all
those in From:, Sender: and Reply-To: headers plus the envelope sender.
This is controlled by the setting
SENDER_HEADERS = ('from', None, 'reply-to', 'sender')
where None refers to the envelope sender. If you don't want to accept a
Reply-To: address as a member, set
SENDER_HEADERS = ('from', None, 'sender')
in mm_cfg.py.
--
Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/
