On 3 Aug 2016, at 8:36, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:

> I got 50 or so virtual mailboxes I go through. I don't want to have 100 to 
> define :/

Yeah, completely understood... I am lucky then to be able to create virtual 
mailboxes including other virtual mailboxes so I do not have to "go through" 
more than a few... Three in fact... When I read and deal with mail. The rest 
(including what you talk about -- find what I discussed with a person) I do via 
search.

But I do, let me say that explicitly, understand your situation.

   Patrik

> -- 
> Max Rydahl Andersen
>
> On 3 August 2016 at 06:12:49, Patrik Fältström (p...@frobbit.se) wrote:
>
>> On 3 Aug 2016, at 0:27, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>>
>> It would be nice but for important mailboxes I just set up smart
>> submailboxes that show only the unread messages.
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Or even groups of important mailboxes, i.e. multiple mailboxes grouped as
>> one virtual one.
>>
>> See <https://stupid.domain.name/node/1895> for a description of my
>> workflow that almost entirely is built using virtual mailboxes.
>>
>> paf
>> ------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> mailmate mailing list
>> mailmate@lists.freron.com
>> https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
>>


> _______________________________________________
> mailmate mailing list
> mailmate@lists.freron.com
> https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate

Reply via email to