I think my original question/observation has become lost in the thread,
and I may not have phrased my last remark well.
Initially, my sig marker was just <dash><dash> and what that caused was
my closing salutation to be made into a header by the markdown
processor, e.g..
best wishes
--
Verdon Vaillancourt
I have since been informed, and then verified that using
<dash><dash><space> OR <space><dash><dash> as my sig marker, leads to
the markdown processor ignoring the sig marker, and not treating it as
if it was a header indicator, e.g..
best wishes
--
Verdon Vaillancourt
In the end, I think mail mate is likely behaving as it should, and I
didn’t understand that the sig marker required a <space> after the
dashes.
Sorry for any confusion I have caused,
v
On 20 Dec 2016, at 19:48, Charlie Garrison wrote:
On 21 Dec 2016, at 10:41, Sam Hathaway wrote:
But, "dash dash space" *is* the proper sig marker, right? As (I
think) we covered earlier in this thread? Does MailMate fall down on
"dash dash space"?
I haven’t tested with different sig markers, but Verdon said:
Introducing the space on either end leads to the <dash><dash> being
ignored by the markdown processor
I read that to mean that MailMate fails with dash,dash,space.
And yes, reading the Usenet RFC, dash,dash,space,newline is correct
sig marker.
cng
--
Charlie Garrison <char...@garrison.com.au>
Garrison Computer Services <http://www.garrison.com.au>
PO Box 380
Tumbarumba NSW 2653 Australia
[Conundrum](http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt)
_______________________________________________
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
_______________________________________________
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
