On 2015-09-09 14:52, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015, at 05:23, Cedric Knight wrote:
>Plus I got a kind response from stevepostmas...@btinternet.com,
>suggesting any SPF record (eg softfail or neutral) would reduce number
>of SPF fails, or delays.
We have SPF records. The problem is that our customers can set up
sieve rules to forward any mail at all, so we can't guarantee that SPF
will always pass.
Not to beat the drum too hard, but SRS? Or at least rewrite in some
fashion such that the mail you emit passes SPF.
--
Dave Warren
http://www.hireahit.com/
http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
