Hi Michael,

Can you advise how one would “ramp up” such a new IP? The very nature of such 
transactional traffic is that it’s bursty, and may go for weeks when one may 
send a few dozen mails, then a few thousand on a specific day, then nothing 
again. Wouldn’t your systems detect that as ‘anomalous’ behaviour and do 
something about it?

Thanks

--
ian

From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Michael Wise via 
mailop
Sent: 09 June 2016 14:27
To: Duncan Brannen <d...@st-andrews.ac.uk>; mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Microsoft/Hotmail discards mails


Separate IPs absolutely help, at least they do now. At some point, separate 
domains will be where it's at. "Canned Responses" are mandated by the Lawyers, 
who have had to deal with ... "Issues".

I have been told that Return Path Sender Score is certainly a factor, and that 
they also have some extra services available, but exactly how they get this 
data I do not know, and can't comment on. I don't know.

The largest factor that drives good reputation is having the Recipients 
safelist the sender. Another huge factor is engaging the recipient in a 
conversation of some sort. Further down the list is making sure that your 
traffic looks as little like spam as possible. If you use tricks that spammers 
do, for instance any kind of hashbuster text, etc... The system *WILL* notice.

Past that, we're not allowed to provide information on why a particular email 
or campaign was sent to junk or silently dropped, and honestly, I have never 
been motivated to figure out the mechanics. Remember that, "Each Sender is 
Unique!", and there's millions of them, and Billions of emails an hour, let 
alone a day.

Aloha,
Michael.
--
Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Duncan Brannen<mailto:d...@st-andrews.ac.uk>
Sent: ‎6/‎9/‎2016 1:16 AM
To: mailop@mailop.org<mailto:mailop@mailop.org>
Subject: Re: [mailop] Microsoft/Hotmail discards mails

Hi,
    Just to throw our tuppence worth in.  We have the same problem.  It seems 
to be noticed when we send out offers of a place of study, a noticeable 
percentage of the emails
are never received despite being accepted by Hotmail / outlook / live.com for 
delivery.  We’re signed up for JMRP / SNDS, have opened tickets but can’t get 
anything
back other than a canned response.  (unusual activity or eligible/not eligible 
for partial mitigation)

Is there a method for feeding back suggestions about this, eg a notification 
along the lines of the Junk report mechanism?  By the sounds of it, there 
really isn’t any way to find out
why emails are silently junked and asking applicants to whitelist the 
University would seem to be the only way to mitigate? Does Returnpath / Sender 
score help in any way here?

One thought is to move all of our ‘business’ (ie official comms to applicants 
and enquirers) to one IP and keep staff/student / bulk email to eg alumni to a 
different IP but if anyone
has any suggestions I’m open to them.

Cheers,
        Duncan


On 09/06/2016, 03:08, "mailop on behalf of Michael Wise via mailop" 
<mailop-boun...@mailop.org on behalf of 
mailop@mailop.org<mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org%20on%20behalf%20of%20mai...@mailop.org>>
 wrote:


At the request of the customer-base, traffic that is classified as sufficiently 
spammy (by various "Black Box" algorithms that I have no knowledge of the inner 
workings...) is deleted even after a successful delivery.

At one point, Hotmail tried to turn off the delete action for sufficiently 
spammy, and just delivered it into Junk; Customers complained. Loudly. So 
whether the system is correctly classifying your traffic or not, I cannot say. 
But the behavior is not unexpected in certain scenarios. Which one of them 
applies to you, I cannot say. Even if I wanted to! But I really have no idea, 
and no way to find out.

This "Delete" action is a well-known mitigation that is not unique to Hotmail.

About the only way around it would be to login to your test account, and safe 
sender the sending email address.
Among other things, that will force the system to reconsider the verdict that 
it has assigned to the IP and the traffic coming from it.

It's possible that the IPs have a left-over bad reputation from a previous 
sender, but that's difficult to tell.

Good luck.

Aloha,
Michael.
--
Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been 
Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ?

-----Original Message-----
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Ziegler
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 6:50 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org<mailto:mailop@mailop.org>
Subject: [mailop] Microsoft/Hotmail discards mails

Hi,

a user of my server complained, that some of his mails don't reach mail 
accounts from hotmail/live/outlook etc. that complaint is nothing new, the 
problem exists for months now.

the users mails are dkim signed, the domain has DKIM and SPF TXT DNS records, 
since yesterday there is also a DMARC record.

i investigated further, set up test accounts on both ends and indeed, they are 
accepting the mail with 250 but it doesn't appear in the inbox or even junk 
folder.

According to SNDS, the IP has "normal status" and no events are logged.
i reached out to them through their form two times and got the same answer 
twice, that the IP doesn't qualify for mitigation.

the thing is, i can't figure out
a) why they discard the mails
b) why they don't reject them, that would be much better

we're a low volume sender, so i investigated the logs manually and can't find 
any outgoing spam.

all of the users recipients do really want to get these mails and are very 
upset that they don't receive them.
and even if they didn't want to, they could tell via mail or even in person, as 
all of them are at the same university (and are friends).

perhaps someone has an additional idea, another form or contact address or what 
can i try to solve this?

ticket numbers: SRX1342522740ID / SRX1342663522ID.

Regards

Andreas

_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org<mailto:mailop@mailop.org>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fchilli.nosignal.org%2fcgi-bin%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fmailop&data=01%7c01%7cmichael.wise%40microsoft.com%7cb2c91735275742b7b2e408d390093f5c%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=ccB7YaSdDu3ZN4SrE8MCC6JwpavpsqE9aJz6InPWXPM%3d
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org<mailto:mailop@mailop.org>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fchilli.nosignal.org%2fcgi-bin%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fmailop&data=01%7c01%7cmichael.wise%40microsoft.com%7c4592c1af89ee4b17001508d3903e4555%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=wSYUN0PzStdiQsACqJ8sN7bUIfXbwVmOLZlPJ7hYjzc%3d


_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org<mailto:mailop@mailop.org>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fchilli.nosignal.org%2fcgi-bin%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fmailop&data=01%7c01%7cmichael.wise%40microsoft.com%7c4592c1af89ee4b17001508d3903e4555%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=wSYUN0PzStdiQsACqJ8sN7bUIfXbwVmOLZlPJ7hYjzc%3d
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to