Does the signing differ between your bulk and transactional mail? If I remember correctly, we ran into an issue with double-signing, where our users' header-from aligned signature was given priority over our signature, which was the one we were using for their FBL.
On Aug 4, 2017 4:38 PM, "Torsten Reinert via mailop" <mailop@mailop.org> wrote: Hey, Does anyone else experience drops in Yahoo! FBL complaints? We are no longer receiving the FBL feed for our commercial emails while our transactional traffic continues to receive FBL traffic (both sent via the same domain but different addresses). Since the FBL is domain-based this seemed odd considering the domain(s) across batch and transactional are the same. Thanks, Torsten ____________________________ *Torsten Reinert* Global Deliverability Manager Email: tors...@groupon.com Groupon Inc. | www.groupon.com _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
