Hi Michael, I recently wrote: > My question would be: If Microsoft does not want all complaining recipients removed / listwashed, which I can understand, why not provide anonymous feedback on bad senders? Provide similar info like Google is providing (with the Feedback-ID or sender domain). Why then provide FBL at all?
My current remark would be that it is beneficial for us to have a decent example set of people who complain. It makes it easier to confront the customer and locate the source of problems. I think 1:5 to 1:20 should be sufficient for that purpose (depending on the volume of that sender domain). . I also think that anonymous feedback is still a good idea. Maybe only for authenticated emails (with aligned SPF/DKIM)? Gives ESPs a reason to (force customers to) authenticate in line with DMARC. Yours, David On 21 November 2017 at 09:25, Benjamin BILLON via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I come to confirm the interest of the community in this question (was: > "Does JMRP provide all or almost all the complaints through FBL as > disclosed in the Live Postmaster page?"). > > @Michael> we understand this topic could be out of your direct scope and > we deeply appreciate every efforts you do to put the case on the right desk. > I'm discussing (through tickets) with the SNDS Support these days, and we > see discrepancy on Complaints numbers between what we receive from SNDS, > what Microsoft sees internally, and the FBL we receive (respectively 29, 1 > and 3, for a given IP in a given time range). > The other weirdness is that with these (objectively low) numbers, the > messages get a BCL of 8. > > Also, I'm sure that any sender participating in this mailing-list would > gladly provide his help and data if it can help anyone at Microsoft, so let > us know! > > Cheers, > -- > <https://www.splio.com> > Benjamin > > 2017-11-03 5:05 GMT+08:00 Luis E. Muñoz <mailop@lem.click>: > >> >> >> On 2 Nov 2017, at 12:24, Michael Wise via mailop wrote: >> >> Apologies for the delay. >> >> No apologies required. Instead, thank you again for your assistance! >> >> -lem >> > > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop > > -- -- My opinion is mine.
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
