Sorry for the noise...

Also from EHLO's of

Feb 9 09:29:13 fe1 msd[20338]: EHLO command received, args: MWHPR22MB0798.namprd22.prod.outlook.com

On 18-02-09 11:23 AM, Michael Peddemors wrote:
Two separate issues I believe...


Aggressive Valid AUTH attempts... EHLO/STARTTLS/AUTH LOGIN/QUIT

All from MWHPR01MB2336.prod.exchangelabs.com

Feb  9 10:06:09 fe1 msd[4699]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:10 fe1 msd[4709]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:11 fe1 msd[4731]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:13 fe1 msd[4770]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:13 fe1 msd[4793]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:13 fe1 msd[4813]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:14 fe1 msd[4832]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:14 fe1 msd[4842]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:14 fe1 msd[4847]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:14 fe1 msd[4849]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:16 fe1 msd[4894]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:17 fe1 msd[4905]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:19 fe1 msd[4937]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:22 fe1 msd[5013]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:23 fe1 msd[5023]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:23 fe1 msd[5025]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:24 fe1 msd[5030]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:24 fe1 msd[5034]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:24 fe1 msd[5041]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:25 fe1 msd[5044]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:25 fe1 msd[5050]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:26 fe1 msd[5070]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:27 fe1 msd[5081]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:27 fe1 msd[5082]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:28 fe1 msd[5089]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:29 fe1 msd[5101]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:29 fe1 msd[5105]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:29 fe1 msd[5108]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:30 fe1 msd[5132]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:30 fe1 msd[5155]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:31 fe1 msd[5187]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:31 fe1 msd[5193]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:31 fe1 msd[5199]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:32 fe1 msd[5226]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181) Feb  9 10:06:33 fe1 msd[5240]: AUTH success: [<same_email_address>] (40.97.117.181)


On 18-02-09 11:08 AM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
I'm confused, the first post said valid credentials, is that what everyone else is seeing?

Nearly all valid creds seems weirder than mostly invalid... modulo whatever amount of hijacked or reused creds there are.

Brandon

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018, 10:59 AM Rich Kulawiec <r...@gsp.org <mailto:r...@gsp.org>> wrote:

    On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:56:43AM +0100, Dan Malm wrote:
     > I'm seeing an extreme amount of SMTP authentications (over 600/s)
    [snip]

    I wouldn't characterize what I've seen as "extreme" at any of the
    observation points I'm monitoring, but I have seen a moderate number of     repeated attempts to authenticate against a mix of existing/non-existing
    accounts, some of which happened slowly and some of which were rapid.

    I used the past tense there because my response was to firewall
    out (what I believe to be) the relevant ranges from access to
    POP(S)/IMAP(S)/submission as applicable to various servers.

    ---rsk

    _______________________________________________
    mailop mailing list
    mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>
    https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop



_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop







--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada

This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.

_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to