On 12/18/20 12:34 PM, Stefan Bauer via mailop wrote:
Project Tar looks like a privacy nightmare to me.
That is a valid concern.One that I personally am not too worried about. But part of that is because I'm only worried about email servers that adhere to proper MX iteration, all of which I control.
Routing my mails to a stranger in case senders just don't honor the standard and dont talk to my primary MX.
Project Tor is one example of the idea. Someone could implement this in house themselves if they wanted the effect without the risk.
I believe it's worth the price of admission. Free + minimal risk given that I have multiple MXs in line before Project Tor.
They promise to reject, but who knows.
Every time that I've tested, they have rejected with a temporary error stating to try a lower number / higher priority MX.
At least in EU/Germany, that is against the law (GDPR/DSGVO)
Would you please elaborate? Either on list or direct, your choice. -- Grant. . . . unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
