On 15/02/2021 21:02, John Levine via mailop wrote: > In article <20210215085929.76srgtpbaqbms...@sys4.de> you write: >> Greetings, >> >> is anyone using ed22519 for DKIM signatures yet and what do you see? Any >> interop problems? > > Aside from the fact that approximately nobody can validate them yet, they're > fine. > > So long as you don't try to use the same selector you use with RSA signatures > they shouldn't cause any problems. >
Well, Rspamd can validate them, but I'd suggest to use dual signatures for now (RSA + ed25519) when signing - it is also supported by Rspamd dkim_signing module, even for the keys rotation scenario. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
