On 2021-02-28 11:16:08 (+0800), John Levine via mailop wrote:
In article <e8e5b6c6-724b-438f-9be6-dd09760eb...@trouble.is> you
write:
Makes things like quick DNS queries, 'View Headers' and many other
simple to use things a quagmire.. Data overload.. If you need that
much data, there MUST be another way to do it (link to the data?)
edns0 not just for DNSSEC anymore? :)
When I look at the logs on my DNS server, I see that everyone allows
at least 1400 bytes
and a lot allow 4096.
Likewise. I'm happy to see fewer and fewer firewalls under the mistaken
belief that DNS packets are invariably tiny.
Can you explain what actual problem a few hundred bytes of TXT records
at the zone apex causes?
I would much rather get one big SPF record that has all of a domain's
info than faff around
putting together a bunch of little includes.
There is no "actual" problem. It only makes eyegrep a little bit more
difficult when there are more than a couple of TXT records scrolling by.
I'm just a cranky old man set in my ways. :)
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Alternative Enterprises
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
