Definitely. They'll even tell you up front that this isn't your average
list and will block legitimate email:
https://www.uceprotect.net/en/index.php?m=3&s=5
On 2023-05-22 15:02, John Devine wrote:
Hmmm I started using dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net a few months ago, should I
desist?
JD
On 22 May 2023, at 17:01, Jarland Donnell via mailop
<mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
I have not personally run into anyone using L3 or L2 in my experiences
thus far. Their L1 list is what most, if anyone, would be subscribing
to I would think. Their L1 list is actually really, really good.
On 2023-05-14 05:47, Slavko via mailop wrote:
Hi,
i read multiple times, from multiple sources about UCEPROTECT
BL, how it is suspicious, etc...
Recently i got notification from ShadowServer, that i am on
blacklist, in particular on UCEPROTECT-L2 BL, which AFAIK
blocks whole networks as anounced by ASN. Thus i was curious,
what happens around me.
Today UCEPROTECT reports 32 incidents for /22 net. We can
discuss if 32 is enough for blocking whole network block or
not, but OK -- 32 incidents is over their policy... But all these
32 incidents was generated by 1 (one) IP! In other words,
one IP is enough for UCEPROTECT to block whole /22 network.
Now i really can know how wrong is this BL (and no, i never
used it, i even removed it from my check script)...
I am not very interested in that list, nor in how bad that RBL
is, but i am curious: is someone (bigger than personal) using
it? Or do you know someone who is using it? What is/can be
the reason to use it?
thanks
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
