> Robert L Mathews said:
> > I hope nobody creates MUA features that show non-BIMI logos in the same
> > space
> > as BIMI logos (or that make it difficult for users to notice the difference,
> > such as a tiny padlock superimposed on it sometimes).
>
> Superimposing something to indicate validity won't work. The bad guys can
> just use a "logo" with that mark already installed.
>
> It might work to put a gold border around checked logos and a black/red
> dashed
> line around non-validated logos.
That's actually a better solution than what I suggested.
> Another possibility would be to differentiate by size, shape, or location.
These options are less likely to work because each vendor will do
things differently, various limitations emerge from different screen
sizes, and some vendors keep changing their user interfaces (which
drives some users absolutely bonkers to the point where they tend to
become desensitized to user interface nuances).
Your first idea is much better.
--
Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com
Randolf Richardson, CNA - rand...@inter-corporate.com
Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc.
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
https://www.inter-corporate.com/
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
