Hi Cas, thanks a lot. All questions answered. 😊
bye Norbert Von: Cas de Reuver <[email protected]> Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Januar 2025 14:45 An: Fehlauer, Norbert <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [mailop] SPF all mechanism Hi Norbert, Not adding this mechanism will return a neutral result if nothing matches: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7208#section-4.7 -- Cas de Reuver http://reuver.co/ On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 2:29 PM Fehlauer, Norbert via mailop <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Hi, usually there's some kind of "all" mechanism (~all, -all ?all) when using a SPF record for a domain. Is a SPF record without an "all" mechanism valid at all (implicit +all) or is this an invalid record in this case? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7208#section-5.1 is not mentioning a "must use" or "must exist". As a SPF record is processed from left to right, it should not matter for valid entries that exist in the SPF record, but there's not statement whtat to do with non matching hosts. Anyone can help? Thanks Norbert _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailto:[email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
