It appears that Niels Kobschätzki via mailop <[email protected]> said: >Hello, > >I have encountered the first time apparently the problem that I have a user >who forwards mails to another mail-server and a forwarded >mail got rejected because of the dmarc-policy of the original senders domain. >I am using SRS and my understanding is that ARC should solve the problem since >DMARC breaks SRS and the solution for that is ARC. > >Now my question: if I implement ARC, what do I do with a mail that is >forwarded? >a) I use always SRS and ARC to sign/seal the message when I forward >b) I only use ARC and no SRS when the original senders domain has a >dmarc-policy (so I need to check that before forwarding)
If you use it at all, sign and seal everything you forward. That's what I do. >Also: does anyone have an idea when the ARC-RFC is finalized? From what I’ve >seen it is marked as experimental for like 6 years now?> Probably never. ARC has found some use internally at large mail systems but the fact that for it to be useulf you still need to keep a list of trusted forwarders means it's not going to solve the problem we hoped it would solve. R's, John _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
