You have the lps functionaliy and also selector functionality with BIMI-Selector, making it possible to put a avatar per user in two different ways.So it would work for most domains that are small, lets say up to 50 users before it becomes an administrative burden.Best regards Sebastian Nielsen -------- Originalmeddelande --------Från: Laura Atkins via mailop <[email protected]> Datum: 2025-11-20 11:37 (GMT+01:00) Till: Mailing List <[email protected]> Ämne: Re: [mailop] VMC/BIMI - Getting a personal VMC certificate? On 19 Nov 2025, at 16:30, Todd Herr via mailop <[email protected]> wrote:On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 11:25 AM Al Iverson via mailop <[email protected]> wrote:And separately, I'll put this on the wish list of stuff that I'll bring up in discussions with others in the BIMI Group. I love the idea of a "personal mark certificate," though I don't know how feasible it is. I'm in the same boat as you, in that I'm not really a company, but I'd love to implement BIMI as broadly as possible.Personally, I shudder to think what my face might look like when rendered in SVG Tiny PS format.YMMV… BIMI is operated at the domain level. The number of single user domains is negligible - probably most easily measured as ppm or ppb. While many of us here on this list ARE in that group, we represent probably a high fraction of the applicable users. Additionally, at least some of those users are going to object to uploading sensitive personal data to a third party verification service. Data collectors seem to have challenges keeping data secure. Fun to speculate about but BIMI seems the wrong protocol to put avatars in email. laura -- The Delivery ExpertLaura AtkinsWord to the [email protected] hints and commentary: http://www.wordtothewise.com/blog
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
