Thanks, everyone, for your suggestions. They’re very helpful.

> On 4 Jan 2026, Peter Nicolai Mathias Hansteen via mailop wrote:
> If you want to run analyses I can make at archived spamd logs available. I 
> have weekly archives going back to late 2021, but I suppose a smaller sample 
> might be just as useful?

That’s a very kind offer, which I may very well take you up on later this year 
if I find myself with some free time.

> On 5 Jan 2026, Niels Dettenbach wrote:
> I think it makes no real sense to run own classical spam traps just to get
> info about potential spammers to block them. The amount / share of spam you
> get down from that is comparably low.

> On 5 Jan 2026, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
> IMO, there are more effective (catch more spam, cost lest to maintain) ways 
> to filter spam locally.

You are both probably right, but I’m trying to solve a specific problem: the 
spam/ham classifier training set is currently heavily biased towards HAM + 
false-positive SPAM, so I am attempting to reduce this bias using spam traps.

> On 5 Jan 2026, Niels Dettenbach wrote:
> Beside this, spamtraps could be used
> (if known to someone bad) as a tool to block valid email traffic.

How? By poisoning the training set with HAM-like messages?

> On 5 Jan 2026, Niels Dettenbach wrote:
> Especially for more small volume email hosts using other datasources instead
> makes much more sense / is way more efficient - i.e.:
> 
> - multiple DNSBLs
> - DCC
> - Pyzor / Razor etc.
> - commercial data sources(for small volume / private use often free entry
> products available)
> 
> to weight it out wih i.e. SA or spamd
> 
> a additionally well configured / adapted fail2ban may help as well very far
> against brute force stuff and even somewhat of (D)DoS.

I have already implemented all these, except DDC, and they work very 
effectively — which leads to a paucity of spam and the bias problem mentioned 
above.

Dan

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to