rating beda "genre" ngga bisa di-compare langsung, begitu kalo ngga salah yg
gue baca di THG .......... higher number means higher performance, tapi ngga
bisa di compare langsung dengan beda tipe .......... CMIIW .........
jadinya, ya 2500 di Sempron dgn 2500 di Barton ya ngga bisa dikatakan
sebanding ......... Sempron bandingin sama Sempron lagi, begitu pula dengan
Barton ..........
Mat Gemboel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello siBass ,
Masalah rating ane ndak mudeng... Percobaan yg ane lakukan sebatas test kecil
saja... Komparasi Sempron 2500+ @1960MHz dengan TBred B 1800+ @ 2200MHz
(keduanya ber-L2 Cache 256KB). Dengan kapasitas RAM yg sama, hasil test SuperPi
1M bisa sama tuh... Kikikiki...
_____________
Best regards,
Mat Gemboel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, February 27, 2006, 1:45:53 PM, siBass  wrote:
> Tapi apakah rating
> buat prosesor sekarang masih sama. Misal sempron 2500+ (1.400mhz) L2
> cache 256 kb apa bener satara dengan barton 2500+ (1.880mhz) L2 cache
> 512 kb?
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mailplus/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
