rupert THURNER wrote: > many thanks, you hacker :) checked it into > http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/pkg/mod_python/trunk. > > built it on 8x, 8s, 10x, 10s and:
You shouldn't need to build on all machines. For 32-Bit builds, building on build8x and build8s is sufficient. For 64-Bit builds you would need build10x also. For 32-Bit builds only rare cases like top make it necessary to build on all releases IIRC. > Cross-referencing indexes... > found SUNWcslx for libc.so.1 > found SUNWcslx for libdl.so.1 > found SUNWcslx for libnsl.so.1 > found SUNWcslx for libpthread.so.1 > found CSWpython for libpython2.6.so.1.0 > found SUNWcslx for libresolv.so.2 > found SUNWcslx for librt.so.1 > found SUNWcslx for libsocket.so.1 > SUGGESTION: you may want to add some or all of the following as depends: > (Feel free to ignore SUNW or SPRO packages) >> SUNWcslx > WARNING: found binaries in normal bin dir that are V8+ > [package] complete for mod_wsgi. > > do you do anything about this as well, or you just leave it? i suppose > i have to copy the packages into home testing, isn't it? In general: Don't ignore it. This warning comes from checkpkg because V8+ binaries shouldn't go into our packages. See http://opencsw.org/standards/build: If you are using newer compilers than studio8, you must specify -xarch=v8, otherwise it will generate code that will not run on some of the older, yet still supported, sparc platforms. Usually GAR sets the right -xarch via CFLAGS for you. If CFLAGS is ignored / overridden by the software you are trying to build you need to work around it. In your case the module looks fine (just built it myself) and checkpkg just needs a small tweak to deal with packages that don't have a bin directory. So this time, ignore it. ;) Sebastian _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
