Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Mon Mar 16 16:55:43 -0400 2009: > I would consider the build descriptions in the repository also > under GPLv2 as derived license.
I won't disagree with this, since I'm ok with it, but I think a build description can be considered separate from mGar itself (even though we house them together in the same svn repo, etc). To me, mGar is a DSL built on top of a DSL. Each build description is the equivalent of a small C program and mGar is the equivalent of libc. Neither is useful on it's own, but not necessarily all part of the same thing, either. Just my 2 cents for the evening. I really am ok with this if we want to blanket license (for simplicity or sanity or whatever) all descriptions under the same license as mGar itself (GPLv2). Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
