Hi Peter,

Am 27.05.2009 um 13:55 schrieb Peter FELECAN:
Looking to libgsf package I see that Robin Kay is the maintainer and
he's retired. However, libgsf is not marked as orphaned. What's the real
status of this package? The packaged release is so old that any new
dependant of which I'm aware cannot be linked with.

Roger worked on it, but had troubles:

Am 10.04.2009 um 02:19 schrieb Roger HÃ¥kansson:

Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
I just build it from SVN without any problems, maybe the LD_OPTIONS change was
more good than expected?
Anyway, libgsf is now in testing:
 libgsf-1.14.11,REV=2009.04.09-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
 libgsf-1.14.11,REV=2009.04.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Maybe I was a bit unclear, the package will build just fine, however libgsf-gnome-1.so isn't linked to the libgsf-1.so that the build produce, but the old one in /opt/csw/lib.
And I've been trying to fix this in various ways but with no luck.
So far the only working solution I've found is to remove libgsf from the build machine when packaging.

h...@build8x :~ > dump -Lv /home/dam/mgar/pkg/libgsf/trunk/work/ pkgroot/opt/csw/lib/libgsf-gnome-1.so.114.0.11
...
[1]     NEEDED          libgsf-1.so.1
...
[16]    SONAME          libgsf-gnome-1.so.114


I've also been trying to build libgda and libgnomedb (which are optional for gnumeric), but there seems to be some incompatibility from upstream so libgnomedb won't built atm.
Nope, no incompatibility here. Builds absolutely smooth. Packages in testing/ now.
Thanks for the good work!

Hmm, I get a bunch of "undefined struct/union member" when building libgnomedb on my build machine, but I've installed the libgda I packaged, I guess the buildfarm have the older one? Otherwise its probably some other package that is missing from my build machine which is installed on the build farm...

Feel free to give him a hand and take a look also.


Best regards

  -- Dago
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@lists.opencsw.org
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Reply via email to