On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Sebastian Kayser <[email protected]> wrote: > Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> I would like to proceed on the splitting of devel packages as a package >> of mine is pending release whether the decision on this topic. >> >> The current poll is >> - 5 maintainers for "split off devel" >> - 1 maintainer for "decide on case-by-case" >> >> Does anyone feel that there is need for more discussion? >> >> Has anyone (especially those who have voted) understood that the split >> will then be mandatory for package releases? > > Do we have a written out wording for what is subject to the _devel split > then? > >> Sebastian, would you be willing to unify the bugs and introduce >> the "bugs-package-link" you suggested once we have clarified this >> issue? > > http://bugs.opencsw.org/<pkgname>
I think the domain bugs.opencsw.org is too nice to use up its top-level namespace! Can we have use like bugs.opencsw.org/p/<pkgname> instead? Otherwise, we could have an explicitly shortcut domain, say, b.opencsw.org for the purpose of deploying shortcuts: b.opencsw.org/<pkgname>, so if anybody had "search opencsw.org" in their resolv.conf, they could use http://b/<pkgname> (apart from the really useful Firefox keyword shortcuts). Maciej _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
