On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Peter Bonivart <[email protected]> wrote: > > Also, we should ask ourselves what's the most important thing for the > users? Is it really stability which we hardly can guarantee or is it > just a frozen state?
Different users, have different scales of importance. To some users, it is important. Ben, specifically, knows of a set of users to whom it is very important. > We're a small organization and to put all the work James did onto > someone else, even if shared by a few, is not time well spent in my > opinion. We should rethink this, not just start it up again. It died > for a reason. The only "reason" it died, is that James got tired of doing the work. Not that it isnt important to do in the first place. but to address what you also wrote: it should be possible to also allow continued release to current, during the [stable release freeze phase]. It's just a matter of implementation choices. In the last round or two, we were actually allowing it. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
