On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Philip Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > I know you mentioned "modules" down the road, but this particular bit > is possibly more useful to a wider audience, so it could be beneficial > that way. > > call it "checkpkgdeps", perhaps ?
It certainly could be used standalone. However, its primary use is to be part of a larger test suite - a modular checkpkg. It doesn't do certain things, for example it doesn't extract the package the way checkpkg does. To be standalone and useful, it would need be armored with the unpacking code. The unpacking code is already there in checkpkg, perhaps we can reuse it? _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
