On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Ben Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > Just for clarification, are you saying that a you'd see: > > 1.2.3,p,sparconly,REV=YYYY.MM.DD
This does not look good. > I presume so, as the alternate isn't very nice: > > 1.2.3,psparconly,REV=... Neither does this. > A third option is to have only one additional field between upstream > version info and REV= that contains single letter sets like: > > 1.2.3,pi,REV=YYYY.MM.DD This is the best in my opinion. Let's treat it as flags and only allow to pick from a fixed list to keep it from getting carried away and be easily checked. p = patched i = i386 only s = sparc only >> Lets avoid people creating >> 1.2.3,ithinkthisisokaybuttryitandletmeknowmkay,REV=YYYY.MM.DD This will also be hard to automatically check. /peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
