Excerpts from Maciej Bliziński's message of Wed Sep 07 16:41:01 -0400 2011:

> I was thinking about a scenario where alternatives are used.  The
> default implementation would be the one cited above, and the second
> choice would be the original pkg-get, which you would choose if you
> really really wanted to.  This way, we get people to understand
> what's going on, but we don't take away the ability to use the tool.

Or we could just place the working tool as
/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get.deprecated (unsupported?) and require people to
use it with that name if they want it still?

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302

_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
.:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.

Reply via email to