Hi Riccardo, > Am 10.02.2015 um 18:46 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmott...@opencsw.org>: > > Hi, > > since I am stubborn of nature, I tried to compile ICU 54 on solaris 9 to see > if by miracle it would just work. > > I get this build error: > > make[1]: Leaving directory > `/home/rmottola/opencsw/libicu54/trunk/work/build-isa-sparcv8/icu/source/layout' > gmake[1]: Entering directory > `/home/rmottola/opencsw/libicu54/trunk/work/build-isa-sparcv8/icu/source/layout' > /opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC -DU_HAVE_ELF_H=1 -DU_HAVE_ATOMIC=0 -I. -I./.. > -I../common -I./unicode -DU_ATTRIBUTE_DEPRECATED= -DU_LAYOUT_IMPLEMENTATION > -xO3 -m32 -xarch=v8 -mt -c -DPIC -KPIC -o LEFontInstance.o > LEFontInstance.cpp > /opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC -DU_HAVE_ELF_H=1 -DU_HAVE_ATOMIC=0 -I. -I./.. > -I../common -I./unicode -DU_ATTRIBUTE_DEPRECATED= -DU_LAYOUT_IMPLEMENTATION > -xO3 -m32 -xarch=v8 -mt -c -DPIC -KPIC -o OpenTypeLayoutEngine.o > OpenTypeLayoutEngine.cpp > "LETableReference.h", line 68: Error: Expected an expression. > "LETableReference.h", line 100: Error: Badly formed expression. > "LETableReference.h", line 104: Error: Operand expected instead of ")". > "LETableReference.h", line 122: Error: Operand expected instead of ";". > "LETableReference.h", line 144: Error: > "icu_54::LETableReference::ptrToOffset(const void*, LEErrorCode&) const" is > expected to return a value. > "LETableReference.h", line 149: Error: > "icu_54::LETableReference::ptrToOffset(const void*, LEErrorCode&) const" is > expected to return a value. > "LETableReference.h", line 151: Warning: There are returns from > icu_54::LETableReference::ptrToOffset(const void*, LEErrorCode&) const with > and without values. > "LETableReference.h", line 158: Error: Badly formed expression. > "LETableReference.h", line 171: Error: Badly formed expression. > "LETableReference.h", line 172: Error: A statement (even if empty) is > required here. > "LETableReference.h", line 383: Error: Expected an expression. > > > Looking at line 68, I see: > LETableReference(const le_uint8* data, size_t length = LE_UINTPTR_MAX) : > > I suppose hat is the ugly problem I already found in gnustep base. > > I can patch that, put I'd prefer to apply the pach only for solaris9, because > otherwise the ifdef's are hard to write. Stupid solaris doesn't have versions. > > How can I apply a patch only for solaris <= 9 ?
See this example here: https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/source/xref/opencsw/csw/mgar/pkg/glib2/trunk/Makefile#46 PATCHFILES_5.9 += 0001-mypatch PATCHFILES += $(PATCHFILES_$(GAROSREL)) Best regards — Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
