Hi Riccardo, > Am 17.03.2015 um 12:18 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmott...@opencsw.org>: > > Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>> Am 17.03.2015 um 10:41 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmott...@opencsw.org>: >>> Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński wrote: >>>> Quick check, CSWgcc3javart only exists in the Solaris 9 unstable catalog. >>>> >>>> curl -s https://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/unstable/sparc/5.9/catalog | >>>> grep CSWgcc3javart >>>> >>>> We could drop CSWgcc3java from the unstable Solaris 9 catalog. >>> Is there something dependent on it? we have gcc4java in the solaris >>> catalog. In case cc java needed, isn't it better to use the gcc 4 version >>> anyway? >>> I'm for removing it, there is a newer replacement. >> >> …which is also broken: >> https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=5045 >> >> I would love to see that fixed for pdftk which requires gcj, but this looks >> harder to fix. > > and gcc3 java did work?
I don’t know, probably not. > but it is in solaris 9 anyway, so pdftk on solaris 10 where you have gcc4 now? > I understand that to get pdftk to work on sol.10 you need a working gcj4 > anyway, so it doesn't speak against removing this. I did not intend it as arguments against removing gcc3java, more like in favor of also removing gcc4java :-) Best regards — Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature