Hi Riccardo, Am 11.05.2017 um 00:17 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmott...@opencsw.org>: > Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Sure, if in doubt just ask:-) >> > I can package on 9x, 10s, 10x. > However on 9s, I get these: > > > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += > binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+ > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += > binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+ > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += > binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libaep.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+ > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += > binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libchil.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+ > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += > binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libsureware.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+ > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += > binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libpadlock.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+ > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += > binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libnuron.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+ > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += > binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libatalla.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+ > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += > binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libubsec.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+ > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += > binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libgmp.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+ > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += > binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/lib4758cca.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+ > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += > binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libcapi.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+ > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += > binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libgost.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+ > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += > binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libcswift.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+ > > since I do not see overrides for others. > > Might it have do with ISA_DEFAULT = sparcv8plus ?
Yes. > If the overrides are legit, is there a better solution to have them go away > than overriding? In this case I would just override with a comment explaining why the ISA was raised. Best regards — Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP