On Sun, 29 Apr 2007, Richard Curnow wrote: > Does the attached patch fix it?
Wow, that was fast. Yes. No segfault now when I index with the binary compiled with the newer gcc 4.1.1. >From a quick look at your patch, it appears that you now release some memory >in a situation where before you didn't. Can you explain what has changed to make the new compiler require that, where the older versions didn't? Or point me at a relevant piece of documentation? > There's more work to be done before a new release, though. Well, you've at least provided a fix in the meantime for people who think to look at the list archives. Thank you. Regards, Stephen Isard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Mairix-users mailing list Mairix-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mairix-users
