On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:59:00 -0400 > > > > I use this since Sep 08, but now I have found a problem with > > http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/make.exe. > > What is this URL? Are you sure this is the binary compiled from > official Make 3.81 distribution patched by the HAVE_DOS_PATHS patch > and nothing else? > I have used the executable downloaded from the cited link which I found in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-09/msg00131.html. > > When I build GFortran with this version of make it fails: > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > ... > > rm -f ./libgcov.a > > ar rc ./libgcov.a libgcc/./_gcov.o libgcc/./_gcov_merge_add.o > > libgcc/./_gcov_merge_single.o libgcc/./_gcov_merge_delta.o > > libgcc/./_gcov_fork.o libgcc/./_gcov_execl.o libgcc/./_gcov_execlp.o > > libgcc/./_gcov_execle.o libgcc/./_gcov_execv.o libgcc/./_gcov_execvp.o > > libgcc/./_gcov_execve.o libgcc/./_gcov_interval_profiler.o > > libgcc/./_gcov_pow2_profiler.o libgcc/./_gcov_one_value_profiler.o > > ranlib ./libgcov.a > > make[4]: Leaving directory > > `/home/Angelo/Downloads/GFortran/gcc/.build/gcc' > > make[3]: *** No rule to make target `cpp.texi', needed by > > `doc/cpp.info'. Stop. > > make[3]: Leaving directory > > `/home/Angelo/Downloads/GFortran/gcc/.build/gcc' > > make[2]: *** [all-stage1-gcc] Error 2 > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/Angelo/Downloads/GFortran/gcc/.build' > > make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/Angelo/Downloads/GFortran/gcc/.build' > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > .... > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Using the official version in Cygwin of make (make-3.81-1) the build > > is completed without problem: When I have seen that fail, I mailed a similar report to Fortran list and they '...verify if you have all the needed tool...': but I had build GFortran less than a month ago and the only thing that could influence the build was MAKE. So I rebuild with the official MAKE in Cygwin and it was completed as the others I did and the new GFortran works! > > Thanks for testing and for reporting this, but please show at least > the offending dependency (the one which the patched Make reports as > missing above, but the unpatched Make does find). My crystal ball > says that VPATH or vpath might be the culprit, so please try to look > at those, and if VPATH is not the problem, please try to analyze the > reasons for the failure and show the suspect parts of the Makefile(s). > > If nothing gives the clue, I guess posting here the full output of > "make -d" in both cases would be the way to go. > I will try but you should to have in mind that building GFortran takes almost 7-8 hours on AMD Duron 1.3 GHz 256 MB! Angelo. _______________________________________________ Make-w32 mailing list Make-w32@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32