On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 13:53 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Someone mentioned mercurial already. It means convincing savannah > sysadmins that this is a good idea, I guess. > > I could sponsor the hosting of GNU make at sourceware.org, which has > mercurial installed, but I guess that's a sort of radical step.
Since GNU make is a fundamental FSF package, with copyright owned by them, etc. I wouldn't feel right about moving it off of Savannah without their permission, and I don't think this is a sufficiently compelling reason to move. If Mercurial were to be supported on Savannah then I guess that's another possibility that I'd consider, of course. I've not seen any plans for this so far though. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.us "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist _______________________________________________ Make-w32 mailing list Make-w32@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
