Craig A. Berry wrote: > > Perhaps there is some rationale or necessity for putting the > C<depend> section where it is. Even if there's not, I'm not suicidal > enough to try reordering MakeMaker sections a few weeks before a > major release, so I think what I'll do is jigger our build procedure > so it always makes the C<all> target explicitly when building core > extensions. Better solutions welcome. >
I note that ext/util/make_ext, which the unix makefile uses to call make in the extension subdirectories, results in an explicit all target. So your jiggering about may just be alignment with common practice. Robin -- Robin Barker | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CMSC, Building 10, | Phone: +44 (0) 20 8943 7090 National Physical Laboratory, | Fax: +44 (0) 20 8977 7091 Teddington, Middlesex, UK. TW11 OLW | WWW: http://www.npl.co.uk
