On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:56:05PM -0500, Ilya Goldberg wrote: > This would require place-holder Makefile.PLs that don't actually make a > package. The directories they would be in are chuck-full of > sub-packages (classes in my case). What would one set 'NAME', etc to? > It seemed a less-clean work-around to me than simply declaring INST_* > as absolute paths in the top-level Makefile.PL. Do you think there may > be a potential problem with this approach?
I don't really understand this part of MakeMaker so... *shrug*
