One other question, in case they do work together, is if there are any
examples anywhere of a working mapbuilder client with Geowebcache (we tried
all the other tiling caches, but haven't had any luck getting them working
at all)?
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Ryan Moquin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW - It appears that mapbuilder can't even use the "States" layer that
> geowebcache comes with out of the box... but openlayers has no problem with.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Ryan Moquin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone tried mapbuilder with GeoWebCache? Using a very basic open
>> layers (v. 2.6) html page, we can load a geoserver layer through geowebcache
>> and have it display along with a gml file of features over top. When we
>> take the same geowebcache url and plug it into mapbuilder, it goes
>> COMPLETELY haywire. The actual tiled image scales and moves drastically
>> differently than the gml features (using the same file that we used with the
>> open layers client).
>>
>> Either way, the features and the layer, do not line up. And the relative
>> positions between the gml points and layer changes, it's not consistent when
>> zooming. The GML points are correctly positioned in mapbuilder though. It
>> seems as though geowebcache will not work with mapbuilder. Has anyone tried
>> this or confirmed this?
>>
>> I also tried out our geowebcache url in the latest "simple" example
>> (from mapbuilder head), in place of the metacarta layer that is loaded (and
>> tiled correctly). As soon as I replace that URL with our geowebcache URL,
>> mapbuilder appears to randomly pull and load tiles. It's almost as if
>> mapbuilder is requesting tiles in a completely different scheme (if that's
>> even possible).
>>
>> If I request the same layer that geowebcache is loading, directly from
>> geoserver into mapbuilder (with no geocache), then everything loads and
>> works perfectly fine (except that it is horribly slow).
>>
>> I'm really hoping that maybe there is an extra configuration parameter
>> that mapbuilder needs, but that wouldn't make sense, since it's using open
>> layers underneath.
>>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Mapbuilder-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mapbuilder-users
