Does the server recover from the memory leak or do you need to restart the server?
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Jonathan Manafi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have narrowed it down to 2 of our layers, where when they are > available, the ajax viewer seems to hang at small zooms, or there > becomes a horrendous memory leak, where the smaller the scale becomes, > the more memory is consumed by mgserver.exe. The most I witnessed turned > out to be around 1.2 GB of memory consumed. With these two layers off, > I can zoom down to 1:.001 with no problems. Both of these layers have > line styles, and one has a single label at a particular zoom level, but > they are both sparse compared to a couple of other layers that have > multiple line styles and/or labels. All of our data being applied is > .SDF files. > > > > > Traian Stanev wrote: > > Try identifying which layer causes the slow down, by selectively turning > off layers. Then see what's peculiar about the layer -- does it have a line > style, or perhaps labeling. There is a known issue around that (layers with > lots of labels at high zoom), which will be fixed very soon. > > > > Traian > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mapguide-users- > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Manafi > >> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:54 PM > >> To: MapGuide Users Mail List > >> Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] map refresh timeout > >> > >> As an update: > >> > >> We began testing our data upgrading to MGOS 2.0 RC4 without using the > >> fusion library, and we are noticing the same issues. The AGG renderer > >> actually causes mgserver.exe to lock up at small zoom scales; today it > >> happened at 1:254, whereas the GD renderer has yet to lock up, but it > >> still takes a good period of time to update the map extents. Compared > >> to > >> MGOS 1.2 with the same dataset, both renderers perform worse when > >> zoomed > >> to a small scale, where, otherwise, they take only split seconds to > >> update when zoomed far out. > >> > >> Has anyone seen this behavior with their data, as this could be a > >> necessary function for our clients? > >> > >> > >> J Manafi wrote: > >> > >>> I have experienced extremely long refresh rates when the zoom scale > >>> > >> is really > >> > >>> low (~1:33 or so). The time it takes to refresh for the Sheboygan > >>> > >> example is > >> > >>> at least 10x normal, and on a custom map, MapGuide server pretty much > >>> > >> hangs > >> > >>> at ~1:236 (currently sitting and waiting). Has anyone else noticed > >>> > >> this > >> > >>> behavior at low scales? > >>> > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> mapguide-users mailing list > >> mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org > >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users > >> > _______________________________________________ > mapguide-users mailing list > mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users > -- Zac Spitzer - http://zacster.blogspot.com (My Blog) +61 405 847 168 _______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users