We do have a generalized layer that we display to about 1:250,000 and then we switch to the watershed atlas. The atlas is then available for the larger scales. The line style is a simple blue line. We didn't want to re-process the atlas because it would take a lot of work and it worked fine with MGE2008. But I suppose we could generalize it and cut it up into many parts if needed. thanks brad
Martin Morrison wrote: > > Are you using a bunch of small segments for lines or a long polyline > with multiple vertexes? Can you generalize the data for when you are > zoomed out and then switch layers to one with more detail as you zoom > in? > > Martin > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of BradM > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 4:48 PM > To: mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org > Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] Is there a file size limit? > > > Yes we turned all other layers off and even tried removing them > completely. > This is a line layer and double line layer for rivers and polygon layer > for > lakes. So it is a mix of several layers. Yes there is labelling but we > turned it off to try to speed things up. We just increased the cache > size > in the ini file and this seems to have helped with speed but it is still > very slow when we select a stream to get its properties. I don't know > which > line style is being used, I will have to get back to you on that > question. > thanks > brad > > > Traian Stanev wrote: >> >> >> There is no size limit. To make sure this layer is to blame, did you > turn >> off all other layers when viewing the map? Also, is this a line layer > or a >> polygons layer. What line style or polygon style is it using to > render? Is >> there labeling? >> >> >> Traian >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mapguide-users- >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of BradM >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 4:15 PM >>> To: mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org >>> Subject: [mapguide-users] Is there a file size limit? >>> >>> >>> After upgrading from MGE2008 to MGE2009 we have noticed a severe >>> decline in >>> map rendering speed for our hydrology layer for British Columbia. > The >>> sdf >>> file is about 800megs and is in the map repository. Is there a file >>> size >>> limit? We have tried to optimize the server to improve speeds with > no >>> success. Any suggestions welcomed. >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-a-file- >>> size-limit--tp19169522p19169522.html >>> Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mapguide-users mailing list >>> mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users >> _______________________________________________ >> mapguide-users mailing list >> mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-a-file-size-limit--tp19169522p19170081.ht > ml > Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > mapguide-users mailing list > mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users > > _______________________________________________ > mapguide-users mailing list > mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-a-file-size-limit--tp19169522p19170435.html Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users