There is a patch for 2.0.2 which makes GDAL stable, can't quite find it in trac?
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S <k...@geograf.dk> wrote: > There are some general troubleshooting tips for rasters here: > http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FdoGdalNotes > > Try the part labeled "Debugging Rasters in MapGuide". > > Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S > > > > psciga skrev: >> >> Hello >> >> after a lot of hours searching in Nabble an trying different procedures, I >> hope of some ideas. The problem: >> >> Using OSGeo FDO Provider for GDAL in MG Studio 2009 I create a feature >> source from a tif file. >> >> Following the example on >> >> http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/browser/trunk/Providers/GDAL/Docs/XmlSchema/GrfpConfigExample.xml >> I load a config file: >> >> <SchemaMapping provider="OSGeo.Gdal.3.2" name="default" >> xmlns="http://fdogrfp.osgeo.org/schemas"> >> <complexType name="defaultType"> >> <complexType name="RasterTypeType"> >> <RasterDefinition name="images"> >> <Location name="C:\loeschen1"> >> <Feature name="251811.tif"> >> <Band name="RGB" number="1"> >> <Image frame="1" name="251811.tif"> >> <Georeference> >> <InsertionPointX>2525500.0</InsertionPointX> >> <InsertionPointY>5718500.0</InsertionPointY> >> <ResolutionX>0.084667</ResolutionX> >> <ResolutionY>0.084667</ResolutionY> >> <RotationX>0</RotationX> >> <RotationY>0</RotationY> >> </Georeference> </Image> >> </Band> >> </Feature> >> </Location> >> </RasterDefinition> >> </complexType> >> </complexType> >> </SchemaMapping> >> >> It runs fine. >> >> The same procedure with an other file fails. No picture is shown. >> >> .... >> <SchemaMapping provider="OSGeo.Gdal.3.2" name="default" >> xmlns="http://fdogrfp.osgeo.org/schemas"> >> <complexType name="defaultType"> >> <complexType name="RasterTypeType"> >> <RasterDefinition name="images"> >> <Location name="C:\loeschen1"> >> <Feature name="261801"> >> <Band name="RGB" number="1"> >> <Image frame="1" name="261801.TIF"> >> <Georeference> >> >> <InsertionPointX>2526500.000</InsertionPointX> >> >> <InsertionPointX>5718000.000</InsertionPointX> >> >> <ResolutionX>0.084666440907558</ResolutionX> >> >> <ResolutionX>0.084668021680356</ResolutionX> >> <RotationX>0</RotationX> >> <RotationY>0</RotationY> >> </Georeference> >> </Image> >> </Band> >> </Feature> >> </Location> >> </RasterDefinition> >> </complexType> >> </complexType> >> </SchemaMapping> >> .... >> >> I can't see a difference. I have attached both files and hope for a lttle >> help. >> >> My local environment: >> >> MGOS 2.0.1 (Apache & PHP) >> MG Studio 2009 >> Win XP pro (SP2) >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> Regards >> Peter >> http://n2.nabble.com/file/n2664565/251811.TIF 251811.TIF ... is running >> http://n2.nabble.com/file/n2664565/261801.TIF 261801.TIF ... NOT running >> > > _______________________________________________ > mapguide-users mailing list > mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users > -- Zac Spitzer - http://zacster.blogspot.com +61 405 847 168 _______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users