>From my experience, anything to do with DWF's if bad news. If your dwgs are just dummy line work, I would still move them to an SDF even without the db need. SDF's are much easier to update with little issues, and are much faster than DWF's.
DWF's are horribly slow, creating them in Autocad and using load procedures to update the layers in Studio is always combersome imo. At least with an SDF you can remove the manual interaction of updating the sdf. Just my two cents. -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/DWF-layers-look-good-in-Design-Review-but-out-of-whack-in-MapGuide-tp7047678p7087814.html Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
