I think we ought to be civil to "guests" and entertain the
idea that there is a bigger world out there besides how to work around the
latest found MI deficiency. GIS people have some broader responsibilities. We
sit on data that could compromise personal privacy. Other spatial data,
if misrepresented, could push policy makers in a direction with decisions they
would not make if the data had been presented correctly to begin with. I
did not agree with Dimitri, but his point of view was not without some
background, he is articulate, and the underlying issues had plenty of relevance
to our craft.
Dick Hoskins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] GIS uses in public health summer course: http://healthlinks.washington.edu/inpho/gis/course.html
|
Title: RE: MI RE: (GIS-L) Wide open GPS - no more SA, starting tonight!
- Re: MI Re: (GIS-L) Wide open GPS - no more SA, starting tonig... John Haynes
- RE: MI Re: (GIS-L) Wide open GPS - no more SA, starting ... Tim Warman
- Re: MI Re: (GIS-L) Wide open GPS - no more SA, start... Dick Hoskins
- Re: MI Re: (GIS-L) Wide open GPS - no more SA, s... Mark Neuhaus
- RE: MI RE: (GIS-L) Wide open GPS - no more SA, starting ... AYoung
- Dick Hoskins