Hi Tom,
Try adding '+over' to SRS definitions
Cheers
Artem
On 5 Jun 2008, at 18:44, Tom Carden wrote:
> 2008/6/5 Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:06 AM, Tom Carden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> What happens if you shrink your area slightly:
>>
>>> bbox = Envelope(Coord(-20037508.34, -20037508.34),
>>> Coord(20037508.34,
>>> 20037508.34))
>>
>> To just a round 20 million. That would mean the BBOX reprojection is
>> less likely to overflow.
>>
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. Sadly the same thing happens.
>
> I've also tried using the built-in projection object, like so:
>
> proj = Projection("+proj=merc +datum=WGS84")
> c0 = proj.forward(Coord(-180,85))
> c1 = proj.forward(Coord(180,-85))
> bbox = Envelope(c0.x, c0.y, c1.x, c1.y)
>
> (85 in there isn't exact, but would have been good enough)
>
> And I've also changed the styles to only render lines (no fill) in
> case it was a layering issue. No luck!
>
> Tom.
> _______________________________________________
> Mapnik-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
>
_______________________________________________
Mapnik-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
