Jon Burgess wrote: > Have you adjusted the 'extent' parameters for your layers in the osm.xml > file:
> <Parameter name="extent">-20037508,-19929239,20037508,19929239</Parameter> > You could simply try removing all those lines. This will cause Mapnik to > query the DB to work out the extents. This will be slow since it has to > scan all the data. > The default extent represents the whole Earth in spherical mercator. I > have not tried any UTM projections but we've seen issues previously when > wrapping occurs during reprojection. It can lead to the sorts of odd > bounding boxes like you are seeing where a 'minimum' co-oridinate in one > co-ordincate system wraps and becomes a maximum when projected. > The default extent numbers will be completely bogus if you've > reprojected all the source data. Ah, I did not bother. I just checked that extent was for sure big enough to cover my data in UTM. I removed the lines and result looks much better now. It may even be correct but I have to do further investigations later. Thanks a lot for the hint. I should have been thinking about it. -Jukka- _______________________________________________ Mapnik-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
