wclapham wrote:

> If a filter field is not found in the source database, is it supposed to
> cause mapnik to abort rendering that entire layer?  or should it just ignore
> that filter and move on to the next?

That's how it currently works, yes. You're not the first to be bitten by 
it, and there's also already a ticket for this, but not much has been 
done there, yet.

http://trac.mapnik.org/ticket/242


-- 
Lennard
_______________________________________________
Mapnik-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users

Reply via email to