John,
Generally I would assume mod_wsgi > mod_python > cgi, but I've not
benchmarked.
If it is of interest to you, it would be great to see your comparisons.
Keep in mind if you are rendering data on the fly (rather than serving
cached tiles) speed differences between server implementations may not
be noticeable.
However, given the large size of the OSM stylesheet, which you are
presumably using, a server implementation that loads the map xml once
will be significantly faster than loading the xml each request, so cgi
will be the slowest.
Dane
On Nov 8, 2009, at 2:23 PM, John Mitchell wrote:
Hi,
I know that I have already asked the below question.
I figured that I would ask one more time in case someone has an
opinion
http://code.google.com/p/mapnik-utils/wiki/WmsInstallGuide
From the above link it gives you 4 choices
Decide whether to run as wsgi,mod_python,cgi,fastcgi (the server has
wrappers for each)
Which one is the fastest in displaying the tiles.
Thanks,
John
_______________________________________________
Mapnik-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
_______________________________________________
Mapnik-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
