Dane
(2011/04/11 13:17), Dane Springmeyer wrote: > > On Apr 10, 2011, at 8:49 PM, 郭 翔 wrote: > >> Dane >> >> The render speed is faster than mapnik0.7.1, thank you very much. > > great. > >> And I have uploaded PNG images to http://trac.mapnik.org/ticket/728. >> > > I looked at your comments. Are you sure you are reading from the same > database? The reason I ask is that I know that osm.org > <http://osm.org> is also running Mapnik2 now and the forest appears > just fine in the tile: http://tile.openstreetmap.org//16/57344/25981.png > > So, are you sure that the upgrade in Mapnik caused this and not the data? I change a server to test, and upgrade to mapnik2, and find forest appears. It's OK. Thank you very much. Best wishes kaku > >> >> Best wishes >> >> Kaku >> >> >> (2011/04/08 22:09), Dane Springmeyer wrote: >>> Kaku, >>> >>> Aside from the lost forest, how are the render speeds? Do comment >>> here if you have any info you want to share: >>> http://trac.mapnik.org/ticket/728. >>> >>> Re: new rendering bugs, yes, potentially. You'll need to document >>> the output format (png?) and ideally provide a before/after image. >>> >>> Dane >>> >>> >>> On Apr 8, 2011, at 2:21 AM, 郭 翔 wrote: >>> >>>> Hello everyone, >>>> >>>> This is Kaku from Rainbow. I used mapnik2 to render Japanese map. >>>> Then compared this map with one rendered by mapnik0.7.1, and found >>>> that in some places, we lost FOREST in this map. Can someone tell >>>> me mapnik2 has some bug in rendering forest or in drawing layer >>>> called LEISURE? Thanks. >>>> >>>> Best wishes! >>>> >>>> Kaku >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mapnik-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users >>>
_______________________________________________ Mapnik-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
