Le Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:23:53 +0200, David MENTRE <dmen...@linux-france.org> a écrit :
> Regarding dependency in README, I would prefer to depend on an > official version (2.0, 2.1, ...) than on a random commit. A commit hash is not a random commit, it's a precise commit. Just like the SVN revision numbers we use for mapnik-osm, for example. As of today, since Mapnik 2.0 cannot support our Printable stylesheet, and Mapnik 2.1 isn't released, I think the best solution is to just update the documentation to use the Mapnik Git, and give the commit hash we've tested, as Jeroen proposed. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni http://thomas.enix.org MapOSMatic http://www.maposmatic.org Logiciels Libres à Toulouse http://www.toulibre.org Embedded Linux http://www.free-electrons.com
