On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 14:20, David MENTRE <dmen...@linux-france.org> wrote: > Hello Jeroen and Thomas, > > 2012/4/17 Jeroen van Rijn <jvr...@gmail.com>: >> So instead of remedying this and allowing >> individual headers to be rescaled as needed properly, I was thinking I >> might as well go with your plan of measuring first, computing an >> overall scale factor and then sending off all the drawing calls. > > I agree with Thomas and I think all of the headers should be of the > same size. And there is a third approach we have not tested yet, > wrapping of the category headers. ;-)
True. And after the revised patch works and is integrated I'll work on that as an alternative. Then we can have people choose what the best approach is. --headers=wrap (default) --headers=rescale ? > More seriously, we should go for a first patch that makes the index > readable. We will improve it later, based on our user base feedback. > "Release early, release often"! I agree wholeheartedly with that approach. :) -- ↑↑↓↓←→←→BA[Start]
