+1 n.b. that the vote lost hdfs and common dev at some point. I've added them back.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Amit Sangroya <sangroyaa...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Stephen Boesch <java...@gmail.com> wrote: >> +1 >> >> 2011/3/29 Doug Cutting <cutt...@apache.org> >> >>> +1 >>> >>> I don't think this creates an incompatibility. It changes the RPC wire >>> format, but we already require that clients and servers run identical >>> builds. No application that ran with a prior version of Hadoop would be >>> broken by this change when it upgrades to this version of Hadoop. >>> >>> Doug >>> >>> On 03/28/2011 09:39 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>> > HADOOP-6949 introduced a very important optimization to the RPC layer. >>> Based >>> > on the benchmarks presented in HDFS-1583 this provides an order of >>> magnitude >>> > improvement of current RPC implementation. >>> > RPC is a common component of Hadoop projects. Many of them should benefit >>> > from this change. But since this is an incompatible change it requires a >>> > vote to be included into a previous branch. >>> > Please vote for inclusion of this change into branch 0.22. >>> > >>> > +1 from me. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > --Konstantin >>> > >>> >> >
